The website implementation looks very sleek and clean; wish the same could be said for server sided implementation.
|
will be using thanks.
you should add a 718-742 revision option nonethelss good job
Is there a reason why you are using HTTP instead of HTTPS and constructing huge URLs with all the data in it instead of sending it as form data? It's poor design and sending secrets in the url is bad
thanks alot sir
I was actually planning to rewrite it to use form data instead of passing it through GET parameters and was speaking to a friend about that not too long ago. There wasn't any specific reason behind it, and I'll be rewriting that. Thanks for catching it.
No problem
Thanks! Link me to a 718 whenever you have time and I can add a snippet for it.
This should help some people starting up servers. Looks pretty good. You plan on investing more time into this?
Yeah of course, I'm actually writing up the next API right now. And if you have any suggestions for any of the current API's or have a request for a new one let me know. I also have plans to add analytics to it, so everyone can have a better idea of how their server works. (If you have any suggestions for the analytics page let me know too)
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
Thread Information |
Users Browsing this ThreadThere are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests) |