|
Of course it's not innovative lol it's a port of code that already exists. I never said it was innovative
And honestly I'd just prefer any kind of response to 2 pages of arguing about a name I changed after post #2. You all seem like intelligent people, don't you have something better to be doing?
being unable to read social settings is the autistic trait ur demonstrating here by not inferring it from his complaint about "nobody posting on a fully tested release" leading to "no innovation". if you can't infer that from his post then u really should practice ur reading comprehension.
i have no interest in trying to change your mind. it would lead to more of the "tangential off-topic bullshit" you seem to care oh so much about.As for the 'bullshit I'm spewing', have you missed my academic citations? Or does your ego trip blind to you hard evidence. I guess straw manning is easier :>
anyone intelligent reading this thread will already know who's opinion to value
let's be realistic, nobody is going to reply here because nobody in this community uses javascript. if the naming discussion didn't come up then i doubt it would have even seen three pages of posts
they are the lucky ones
Also for anyone viewing this thread wondering if a hash should be technically irreversible or not: it's whatever the fk ur textbook or professor tells you it is. No one cares that much outside of a CS test (also when u talk about hashing theres a 99.9% chance its irreversible).
no because you are not using that hash to reverse anything, you're using *every other possible input in the world* to find one that also produces the same hash as the one you've got, then making an informed "guess" when you find collisions.
that's not reversal in any sense of the word, you aren't "reversing" any process, you're repeating the same input process N amount of times. you're not working backwards from the hash to find what produced it, you're working repeatedly forwards to find something that also produces the same hash.
looks like another bruteforced xtea type of thread lol
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
Thread Information |
Users Browsing this ThreadThere are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests) |