Thread: JavaScript implementation of Jagex base-37 string encoding/decoding

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 39
  1. #21  
    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Age
    27
    Posts
    2,861
    Thanks given
    127
    Thanks received
    226
    Rep Power
    700
    Quote Originally Posted by Scu11 View Post
    are u really surprised that this discussion started given the content? would u really rather either a) nobody posts or b) people post "looks good nice work" - without even understanding its purpose?



    base37 is hardly innovative...


    Of course it's not innovative lol it's a port of code that already exists. I never said it was innovative

    And honestly I'd just prefer any kind of response to 2 pages of arguing about a name I changed after post #2. You all seem like intelligent people, don't you have something better to be doing?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. Thankful user:


  3. #22  
    JavaScript implementation of Jagex base-37 string encoding/decoding



    Scu11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Age
    30
    Posts
    16,307
    Thanks given
    7,215
    Thanks received
    12,308
    Rep Power
    5000
    Quote Originally Posted by Pure2Ownage View Post
    You do know that "im capable of reading the implication in his sentence without him explicitly stating it" is a trait commonly associated with people on the autism spectrum, right?
    being unable to read social settings is the autistic trait ur demonstrating here by not inferring it from his complaint about "nobody posting on a fully tested release" leading to "no innovation". if you can't infer that from his post then u really should practice ur reading comprehension.


    As for the 'bullshit I'm spewing', have you missed my academic citations? Or does your ego trip blind to you hard evidence. I guess straw manning is easier :>
    i have no interest in trying to change your mind. it would lead to more of the "tangential off-topic bullshit" you seem to care oh so much about.

    anyone intelligent reading this thread will already know who's opinion to value


    Quote Originally Posted by jameskmonger View Post
    And honestly I'd just prefer any kind of response to 2 pages of arguing about a name I changed after post #2. You all seem like intelligent people, don't you have something better to be doing?
    let's be realistic, nobody is going to reply here because nobody in this community uses javascript. if the naming discussion didn't come up then i doubt it would have even seen three pages of posts

    Attached image
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #23  
    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    253
    Thanks given
    39
    Thanks received
    146
    Rep Power
    248
    Quote Originally Posted by Scu11 View Post
    nobody in this community uses javascript.
    they are the lucky ones

    Also for anyone viewing this thread wondering if a hash should be technically irreversible or not: it's whatever the fk ur textbook or professor tells you it is. No one cares that much outside of a CS test (also when u talk about hashing theres a 99.9% chance its irreversible).
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. Thankful users:


  6. #24  
    Ex Rune-Scaper

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    3,534
    Thanks given
    457
    Thanks received
    1,257
    Rep Power
    990
    Quote Originally Posted by Scu11 View Post
    then don't claim you are "reversing it"

    you are taking a well-informed best guess at an input that produces an identical hash - there is no reversal in your process whatsoever
    If you can take a hash and find out what the input was I'd definitely consider that a reversal.
    Attached image
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #25  
    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Age
    27
    Posts
    2,861
    Thanks given
    127
    Thanks received
    226
    Rep Power
    700
    Quote Originally Posted by Scu11 View Post
    if the naming discussion didn't come up then i doubt it would have even seen three pages of posts
    Three pages of complete bullshit on my post isn't really doing me a favour, Scu. Anyway, I certainly have better things to be doing. Let me know if you need any help using the package!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. Thankful user:


  9. #26  
    JavaScript implementation of Jagex base-37 string encoding/decoding



    Scu11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Age
    30
    Posts
    16,307
    Thanks given
    7,215
    Thanks received
    12,308
    Rep Power
    5000
    Quote Originally Posted by nshusa View Post
    If you can take a hash and find out what the input was I'd definitely consider that a reversal.
    no because you are not using that hash to reverse anything, you're using *every other possible input in the world* to find one that also produces the same hash as the one you've got, then making an informed "guess" when you find collisions.

    that's not reversal in any sense of the word, you aren't "reversing" any process, you're repeating the same input process N amount of times. you're not working backwards from the hash to find what produced it, you're working repeatedly forwards to find something that also produces the same hash.

    Attached image
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. Thankful user:


  11. #27  
    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Age
    24
    Posts
    1,980
    Thanks given
    334
    Thanks received
    1,051
    Rep Power
    5000
    looks like another bruteforced xtea type of thread lol
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #28  


    Major's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    2,997
    Thanks given
    1,293
    Thanks received
    3,556
    Rep Power
    5000
    Quote Originally Posted by Tommeh View Post
    looks like another bruteforced xtea type of thread lol
    yeah another thread of morons pretending they know stuff

    as always, Intrice Joe is the only non-programmer post worth reading. if you're browsing through this thread and want to learn something, skip the others
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #29  
    Registered Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    59
    Thanks given
    30
    Thanks received
    20
    Rep Power
    58
    Quote Originally Posted by jameskmonger View Post
    Three pages of complete bullshit on my post isn't really doing me a favour, Scu. Anyway, I certainly have better things to be doing. Let me know if you need any help using the package!
    The people with java cups obv. know best m8 you should listen to them
    Attached image
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #30  
    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Age
    27
    Posts
    2,861
    Thanks given
    127
    Thanks received
    226
    Rep Power
    700
    Quote Originally Posted by Major View Post
    yeah another thread of morons pretending they know stuff

    as always, Intrice Joe is the only non-programmer post worth reading. if you're browsing through this thread and want to learn something, skip the others
    Can you guys continue this dick-waving ego trip over PM or on a different thread, please?

    I called it a hash, it probably isn't a hash, I renamed it. No one needs to read 30 posts arguing about what is and isn't a hash. Please find a better use of your time.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. Thankful user:


Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)


User Tag List

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 04-17-2010, 12:43 AM
  2. Videos of Jagex workers :)
    By Ed in forum Media
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 07-23-2009, 02:43 PM
  3. Hotyute HD client for 64 bit?
    By Mr Fox in forum Requests
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 06-27-2009, 11:40 PM
  4. 64 bit windows?
    By Colby in forum Software
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-10-2009, 11:35 PM
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •