|
go through all of the clients, find the packets, match all packets that are the same for each client, can be done manually or automatically if you know what you're doing, after you find and match all the correct packets, go through and get the correct measures per client of if they send short, byte, long, whatever, and add them into a way that checks to see how the appropriate packet needs to be sent server sided, however once you find all of the packets you could edit each client so they all match the same way of sending, and then edit the lengths, but we don't need to do that. after you have all of those handled correctly, game typically works fine after a few manual tweaks. OR you can just do a very basic way of manually finding each packet and converting them into the server, and use a switch statement per revision, and then using the update rollout feature I have, you take disable and add features as they are added into the game per the date, also can be added into the clients as well if you edit a packet to be sent into the client containing a date or something, then you can disable and add features into the client as they roll out. there are many ways of doing the multi revision, it really is not hard, but a lot of people like to think it is.
Also you are the first person to request quest footage, I will get you some.
rsc support when - btw be sure to use my repo for reference if you need help understanding anything in rune tek 3!
when I add the rsc, I wont actually have it connecting to the same server since there are so many differences in rsc such as the chatting for npcs, and such that in my opinion there are so many i dont think it would be beneficial at all to keep in the same server, but can have a server loaded in parallel and have the same features, and the same load/save files per character. and have it launch the same way through the GUI. which is how I am going to support it, however RSC support will be added when I have completed everything else I plan to have in the RS2 version.
Not sure what the point of this is. Almost none of the revisions that you claim to have on the era select screen actually match up with the revision numbers shown at 1:23. Including the supposedly authentic Christmas 2004 cache, which in your video includes the Troll Romance quest that wasn't even added until 2005...
But anyway now that you have a server working you can finally show off what NPCs 1016, 1017, and 1018 are in revision 240. (At least, that was your excuse why you couldn't do it in the last thread)
So from what I am getting from your reply, Dakota, is that there is some confusion on the current state of this project. Many thought you're list was things already there. Which the blame for the confusion comes from a mix of how people interpreted the phrasing combined with a lack of clearly stating which parts are complete and which are WIPs.
With that cleared up and the possibility to practically stated, I'm not sceptical that someone can do this type of project. However my issue now lies with your attitude, around people asking the questions to get clarification, and how you act superior to others.
I mean ChatGPT hasn't been around that long, yet you act as if it has. Also the way you describe using ChatGPT sounds like you aren't as skilled of a coder as others who have asked questions, answered questions, or even been working on quests for a long time. Once again ChatGPT hasn't been around that long and they didn't have it to assist, yet you say these other coders are inefficient. That's pretty arrogant sounding, and honestly a bad look.
So far from my time here in the RS PS community I've noticed although most are toxic to eachother often, they seem to at least have respect for each others skills as coders. You seem to not have any respect twoards your fellow coders. I respect the project and the work you have done, but a tip, respect is earned not given, they've earned their respect between eachother, even if they get into it and become toxic to one another over something so small and stupid as a project that is similar but not the same.
Which is why even when/if this is released I sadly will not play it, which is sad because it sounds like an amazing project.
I have no respect for people here because from the moment I came here I have been attacked, and accused of things which are not true and them claiming my things are fake, and being harassed, just because they cant figure out how I was able to do certain things or have certain things. So the best logical answer for people here is saying its fake and attacking me.
I am only putting the same energy back to people that they come at me with.
You come at me with no respect, you get no respect in return.
as for OpenAI, everything I coded into the server was created without AI and was from far before I knew about it. My responses are mostly stating ways that things can be done faster or more efficiently not nessisarily how I have done so. However I have now integrated OpenAi into the server and I am currently using it for bot responses and personality, and having them contain a learning knowledge base. Still in the works but it is indeed integrated at the moment, not perfect yet.Also the way you describe using ChatGPT sounds like you aren't as skilled of a coder as others who have asked questions
is completely un necessary to state and not true. I have been coding and developing for 15 years now.sounds like you aren't as skilled of a coder as others who have asked questions
the things I stated in the bullet pins are currently already added. they are not future plans those are things done and finished, however does not mean I wont go back and tweak a few things on them here and there.So from what I am getting from your reply, Dakota, is that there is some confusion on the current state of this project. Many thought you're list was things already there.
yes and I will state it again, they are very inefficient, I dont need OpenAi or any such to be much more efficent than they are either.yet you say these other coders are inefficient
Comes from the fact that when I have something and they dont know how I do it so they claim its not possible, And in such cases yes I am indeed superior over them because they are stupid and think they are smart, claiming I cant do things, I dont need to act superior because I am superior when people are stupid.However my issue now lies with your attitude, around people asking the questions to get clarification, and how you act superior to others.
Last edited by Dakota1; 04-12-2023 at 02:11 AM.
I am very impressed with this project, has been very interesting to read through and watch the videos on your youtube channel. Just wanted to give positive feedback. Keep up the good work, really hope this project reaches its conclusion and is released
Please don't let the haters get to you. Some of us are actually looking forward to this project.
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
Thread Information |
Users Browsing this ThreadThere are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests) |
Tags for this Thread |