ScapeOS - A 2005 RuneScape Emulation

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by I hate Guns [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Yeah I actually saw this video when doing the dough mechanic, and I literally couldn't find the interface they used for that. I could find the "select options.." interface, and I tried to move the sword components, but that didn't work (the swords would just go out of bounds etc..), and thats why I ended up using the same interface that is used for fletching.

---

Wow that's crazy. I edited my original post btw, but tbh seems like you already know that if you found that video. Maybe consider making something iterate doing ::interface <id> and then making the client take screenshots. Then just leave that running for the night and have a bunch of pictures to refer to when you wake up for the future.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Arham [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Wow that's crazy. I edited my original post btw, but tbh seems like you already know that if you found that video. Maybe consider making something iterate doing ::interface <id> and then making the client take screenshots. Then just leave that running for the night and have a bunch of pictures to refer to when you wake up for the future.

---

Thats not a half bad idea, I will try to do that. Thanks a lot man.

Ah shit, here we go again.

Wasn't 2005 Runescape 369? or iirc between 317 - 380?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by iGarrett [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Ah shit, here we go again.

Wasn't 2005 Runescape 369? or iirc between 317 - 380?

---

Revisions changes frequently, rs goes through multiple revisions in a year, look at OSRS, it’s already at like 188 - 190 now.

This specifically is 289 :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by iGarrett [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Ah shit, here we go again.

Wasn't 2005 Runescape 369? or iirc between 317 - 380?

---

Yes. They went really fast from 280ish to 377+. 289 is from january 25 while 317 is from may 5 (somewhere like that)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrClassic [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Yes. They went really fast from 280ish to 377+. 289 is from january 25 while 317 is from may 5 (somewhere like that)

---

377 was May of 2006, not 2005.

Hey guys.

Unfortunately I have decided to upgrade to the #319 revision, the #289 cache was simply too incomplete, even after trying to pack what was missing in from higher revisions and such, it wasn't the greatest of results.

The 319 revision is the closest cache I could find, a new skill is introduced with this rev which is slayer, some models looks a bit different, couple new quests iirc, but other than that it's almost identical to 289.

If ANYONE has a more complete cache, please let me know, I would love to resume to 289, but as of now thats just not an option.

Right now I'm just working on access points throughout the server.

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by arseny [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

377 was May of 2006, not 2005.

---

He said 317 though :aware:

Best of luck with this. Wont be saying ill play but i'll defo be following.

Time to work on runecrafting :)

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by I hate Guns [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Hey guys.

Unfortunately I have decided to upgrade to the #319 revision, the #289 cache was simply too incomplete, even after trying to pack what was missing in from higher revisions and such, it wasn't the greatest of results.

The 319 revision is the closest cache I could find, a new skill is introduced with this rev which is slayer, some models looks a bit different, couple new quests iirc, but other than that it's almost identical to 289.

If ANYONE has a more complete cache, please let me know, I would love to resume to 289, but as of now thats just not an option.

Right now I'm just working on access points throughout the server.

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]



He said 317 though :aware:

---

Are you still continuing with 289 because the rest is crossed out? Tbf I dont see any reason why you can't load what's missing on the old cache but it will take a bunch of modification obviously