Thread: jaggrab Protocol

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1 jaggrab Protocol 
    Registered Member
    natsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Age
    32
    Posts
    3,435
    Thanks given
    1,084
    Thanks received
    676
    Rep Power
    1096
    why does the jaggrab service protocol run on 43594 and the server port also?
    does it matter if there 2 different ports?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Father Of Lies


    Join Date
    May 2012
    Age
    26
    Posts
    1,216
    Thanks given
    267
    Thanks received
    289
    Rep Power
    242
    It has to bind to a port, so no, it can't be on that port. Just use 43595.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Registered Member
    natsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Age
    32
    Posts
    3,435
    Thanks given
    1,084
    Thanks received
    676
    Rep Power
    1096
    k thanks i just removed binding to port 43594 because it didnt do anything 0_o lol other then bind to that port since ondemand protocol is 43595 not sure why graham used it in his update server.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Registered Member
    thim slug's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Age
    28
    Posts
    4,132
    Thanks given
    1,077
    Thanks received
    1,137
    Rep Power
    5000
    it uses port 43595

    Quote Originally Posted by natsu View Post
    k thanks i just removed binding to port 43594 because it didnt do anything 0_o lol other then bind to that port since ondemand protocol is 43595 not sure why graham used it in his update server.
    You've got it the wrong way round lol
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  


    Major's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    2,997
    Thanks given
    1,293
    Thanks received
    3,556
    Rep Power
    5000
    On-demand and JAGGRAB aren't the same thing - in older clients, JAGGRAB must run on 43,595, and on-demand should stay on 43,594.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Registered Member
    natsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Age
    32
    Posts
    3,435
    Thanks given
    1,084
    Thanks received
    676
    Rep Power
    1096
    Quote Originally Posted by Major View Post
    On-demand and JAGGRAB aren't the same thing - in older clients, JAGGRAB must run on 43,595, and on-demand should stay on 43,594.
    i always assumed that it was the same mind explain what the difference is then?

    @also atm am binding ondemand to 43594 and server port to 43594 but i cant connect

    Code:
    	/**
    	 * Starts the file server.
    	 * 
    	 * @throws Exception
    	 *             if an error occurs.
    	 */
    	public void start() throws Exception {
    		logger.info("Starting workers...");
    		pool.start();
    
    		logger.info("Starting services...");
    		try {
    			start("HTTP", new HttpPipelineFactory(handler, timer),
    					NetworkConstants.HTTP_PORT);
    		} catch (Throwable t) {
    			logger.log(Level.SEVERE, "Failed to start HTTP service.", t);
    			logger
    					.warning("HTTP will be unavailable. JAGGRAB will be used as a fallback by clients but this isn't reccomended!");
    		}
    		start("JAGGRAB", new JagGrabPipelineFactory(handler, timer),
    				NetworkConstants.JAGGRAB_PORT);
    		start("ondemand", new OnDemandPipelineFactory(handler, timer),
    				NetworkConstants.SERVICE_PORT);		
    
    		logger.info("Ready for connections.");
    	}
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  


    Major's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    2,997
    Thanks given
    1,293
    Thanks received
    3,556
    Rep Power
    5000
    On-demand is the main protocol that always serves the entire cache, when available. JAGGRAB is a backup protocol only used when on-demand is unavailable, and it can only request parts of idx0.
    Last edited by Major; 09-20-2014 at 06:20 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Registered Member
    natsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Age
    32
    Posts
    3,435
    Thanks given
    1,084
    Thanks received
    676
    Rep Power
    1096
    Quote Originally Posted by Major View Post
    On-demand is the main protocol that always serves the entire cache, when available. JAGGRAB is a backup protocol only used when on-demand is unavailable, and it can only request parts of idx0.
    ha ok , should the login port of the server stay the same as on ondemand ? or doesnt it really matter if i change the login port to 43596 for example.
    Last edited by Major; 09-20-2014 at 06:21 PM. Reason: Correct error in my quote
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  


    Major's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    2,997
    Thanks given
    1,293
    Thanks received
    3,556
    Rep Power
    5000
    Quote Originally Posted by natsu View Post
    ha ok , should the login port of the server stay the same as on ondemand ? or doesnt it really matter if i change the login port to 43596 for example.
    Well it'd work if you changed the client too, but running them on the same port isn't your issue so it would be pointless...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Registered Member
    natsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Age
    32
    Posts
    3,435
    Thanks given
    1,084
    Thanks received
    676
    Rep Power
    1096
    Quote Originally Posted by Major View Post
    Well it'd work if you changed the client too, but running them on the same port isn't your issue so it would be pointless...
    then how should it be done?

    @hyperion doesnt even use a service port 0_o only jaggrab 43595 and that's it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)


User Tag List

Similar Threads

  1. 317+ JAGGRAB Protocol
    By Tom in forum Informative Threads
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-12-2012, 03:47 AM
  2. The current RuneScape 2 protocol
    By veer in forum Informative Threads
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 06-13-2009, 07:14 PM
  3. #530 World List Protocol + Server Implementation
    By Graham in forum Informative Threads
    Replies: 69
    Last Post: 05-26-2009, 08:11 AM
  4. To anyone that knows the 500+ protocol well.
    By blakeman8192 in forum RS 503+ Client & Server
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-12-2009, 11:49 PM
  5. Encouragin's 474 (XSocket protocol)
    By Encouragin in forum Downloads
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-22-2009, 07:13 PM
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •