Printable View
The last commit on master was 21 days ago, but there have been a few PRs raised even more recent than that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrant [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
There are also a good number of people using rsmod for their private projects who aren't contributing to the main project.
I know how open sourcing works. Just because hosting using other open source servers with less community effort would be worse doesn't void or nerf the possibility.Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
Doesn't take a top 10 server to get hit with ransoms. All I'm saying is this project gained attention, and based on the tests currently available, it's very obvious what HASN'T been properly tested. I'd argue that makes the server easier to attack, as you don't have to dig into spaghetti code to see what was overlooked - exploits can be found just by looking at test files (poor testing/lack of coverage highlights the potential attack vectors).
It's an incredible contribution to the community, of course. But hosting on top of this would be risky unless you used systems which others can't study, buying time for the team to catch the exploit before the users do. All I was saying is if he were to host this, it would be wise to avoid using systems which are public and not fully tested.
In the discord people upload there changes such as skills etc...Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrant [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
ive not been as active because i have been dealing with an illness irl and now im having to focus on my own server and put a lot of work towards that. i do have plans for rsmod though, including a big infrastructure change with core changes (you can find most of them as issues on the github). i have stated what the changes were going to be and that ill probably end up rewriting the core completely, in the discordQuote:
Originally Posted by Tyrant [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
Looks great, love the idea. Hopefully I can contribute to this project by creating some nice plugins :D
It was great following it so far, learned alot from it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Indova [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
Hi, pardon my ignorance as I'm very new to this project. I have read on rs-mod GitHub that they are trying to make the server revision independant. The revision #184 is available in the runestats archive, but this client is #181. Can this client just load #184? Or is there something that needs to be done client/server side?
your best of using RL+ atm or you could join the rs-mod discord and ask if some has a 184 client.Quote:
Originally Posted by Skuka [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
Sexual.
I've dropped on to say this:Quote:
Originally Posted by ipwxy [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
As a Software engineer i can say code coverage doesnt solve anything when it comes to exploitation. You strike me as somebody that is attempting to zero in on minor things and pull the testing card to sound smart.
This is an open source contribution to a community that is inherently greedy and i personally think its a crappy idea to try and make it look bad simply to make yourself seem like you know what's in and what's out.
At the end of the day i know of no RSPS that is protected by TLS or anything else so in terms of exploitation/potential ransom type situations then 100% code coverage doesnt mean a thing.
Too many times in industry do you get nazi JS developers whining about code coverage when it's the least thing to worry about.