Option to add your own presets would be cool, and a slight buff to the bm you get from bots would be nice until player base is bigger
|
Looks great the FPS is a bit on the lower side but if this rsps gets more content I could see this project becoming more succesfull!
Would love to see this project go to places maybe open source it for people to contribute?
Good old rspswebclients days! HAHAHA
I miss the old peeps in the chat like Stewie Kieran etc.
Option to add your own presets would be cool, and a slight buff to the bm you get from bots would be nice until player base is bigger
Last edited by Morgan; 07-24-2022 at 08:17 PM.
Yes the FPS arent astounding because the webclient is fullscreen by default, switched back to fixed or even a smaller window size and you'll see the max of 50 easily.
The core base needs a bit of work and we're willing to pay for that for the greater good of the rsps community (its open source).
Fun fact, I started the first ever webclient based community in 2009 (rs - ps dot org) before RSW or RSPSC carbon copied the idea.
Yeah we disabled that feature temporarily as it needs fixed up, but will definitely be re-adding it!
Also, xat died alongside webclients because of the NPAPI deprecation in all major browsers, this was probably a good thing overall at the time (I had been ratted so many times at that point ).
But we can build something similar in HTML5 for sure,
Edit: Xat is still alive (its been ported to html5) and we'll think about it lol
Check out the PVP bots, I just built them over the weekend so they need some more intelligence and tweaking but thats coming.
Edit: Should say Detuks and I are teaming up on this project incase there is confusion on the accounts.
The only reason why people stopped using a webclient was that google and other popular browsers dropped support for java due to too many malicious JDB's. Secondly, why would you pay people to work on it when it's open source?
Thats what I said, but there were likely commercial reasons behind it too. Google were planning to release their own "NaCl" at the time.
I'm paying because I want to get things done and we only have two people currently! Just because its open source doesnt mean people can't be incentivized to work on it.
How is wanting to offer payment for some extra help to speed up the process anything against the principals of open-source? I can name a big list of projects that is open source and has been made to benefit others where corps put a ton of money into it in the making. Not everyone wants to monitize their project.
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
Thread Information |
Users Browsing this ThreadThere are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests) |