Personally used Ktor and Micronaut (both in Kotlin) and have a preference for the latter. Not sure why you're comparing netty to Ktor (etc) as most of them use netty under the hood.
|
Personally used Ktor and Micronaut (both in Kotlin) and have a preference for the latter. Not sure why you're comparing netty to Ktor (etc) as most of them use netty under the hood.
Used each in web API development at work. I used Ktor ~2 years ago - found it intuitive, but too ceremonious. Micronaut is very enjoyable to work with; it's flexible, has widespread adoption and framework support, is high level enough to keep things simple, but also allows for you to be as granular as you need to be. Unfortunately find myself using Micronaut with Groovy (instead of Kotlin) for the time being. Oh well.
Ngl I had too much fun reading that second sentence hahahaha. I'm looking it up rn.
-- edit
https://guides.micronaut.io/creating...ide/index.html
this is pretty juicy.
Not a single networking library can touch CoralReactor | Coral Blocks
Leaves them all in the dust.
That benchmark is bs and the company looks sus. Let me tell you why that benchmark is bad. The code comparison given doesn't even use Netty's ByteBuf but java.nio.ByteBuffer, that alone should tell you this is at best a bad comparison by someone who doesn't understand the library and at worse deliberately misleading.
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
Thread Information |
Users Browsing this ThreadThere are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests) |