In between. Something that uses Object orientation, but easy to comprehend.
|
|
06-09-2011, 07:29 AM
What are your opinions on the two different design standards?
Complex server designs
(e.g. Hyperion)
PROS
- Object orientated
- More organized
- Easier to manage/update
CONS
- Slower execution times
- Not always easy to understand what is going on
Simple and to the point server designs
(e.g. RuneSource)
PROS
- Simple and straight to the point
- Easy to understand what is going on
- Super fast execution times
CONS
- Not object orientated
- Less organized
- Harder to manage/update
In between. Something that uses Object orientation, but easy to comprehend.
You should elaborate more on what you mean by complex and simple designs.
complex designs are not necessarily slower nor harder to understandComplex server designs
(e.g. Hyperion)
PROS
Object orientated
More organized
Easier to manage/update
CONS
Slower execution times
Not always easy to understand what is going on
also: "There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies."
Hah! I love that quote.Originally Posted by Machiavelli
I'd rather my server use OO throughout the whole thing and can process everything in 550-570ms or something like that rather than have a slop of shit that can process everything under 100ms(for example, runesource).
If you can't not see what I said being logical with also getting thanks from people higher in this community you should just listen
Classifying hyperion as Complex is a joke. Its highly threaded which if you know how the system works is far from complex. RuneSource being known as not Object Oren. is a joke. Hyperion being Object Oren is a joke. All these facts are dependent on one fact and that is the developer. Now seeing a post by you saying im uneducated is quite funny as I do not post a thread about a unless topic and report posts that show you wrong and to add I dont cry about how the community isnt growing since i have been getting us out of the delta mess. Yes RiotScape was not the best source but that was released a while ago and yet it is the top source used today. Now once apollo comes out i will be more then happy to produce plugins but until that time is Hyperion is not the best source. Runesource is not the best source. They are all dependent on who develops the server.
Now since I didnt want to support this thread and have to post on this I hope this fills up that empty ego space you once had.
If you can not see how pointless this thread is then please for the goodness of this and the future of this community delete everything to do with rsps and more to counter strike.
I didn't even report that post, I don't know why it was removed.
Regardless, I agree that the "PROS" and "CONS" I stated are not entirely valid. However, the whole point of this thread is to get people's opinions on what type of design they like better, simple and minimal OO like RuneSource, or complex and highly OO like Hyperion.
I prefer a large amount of OO in my server because it helps me stay organized and keep my code clean.
Originally Posted by blakeman8192
and as long as it has no problem processing everything in 600ms.
I believe Blake got RuneSource to execute the cycle in ~17ms with 2k players all spamming the chat packet.and as long as it has no problem processing everything in 600ms.
| « Ground Objects and Items | Nazi Zombies [IDEA] » |
| Thread Information |
Users Browsing this ThreadThere are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests) |
eeeee
