Printable View
Thanks for this. It has been very helpful.
Edit: I was struggling with packet 174 but have since resolved the issue (initially I was doing what Galkon also did at first; using soundType as a volume control). Fortunately I managed to resolve the packet sizing issue and am able to correctly send the packet with volume attached.
Sorry for the bump, but where do i have to add:
Code:public void sendSound(int id, int type, int delay, int volume) {
if(c.getOut() != null && c != null && id != -1) {
c.getOut().putOpCode(174);
c.getOut().writeShort(id);
c.getOut().writeByte(type);
c.getOut().writeShort(delay);
c.getOut().writeShort(volume);
c.flushOutStream();
}
}
-FIXED-Code:public void sendSong(int id) {
if (c.getOut() != null && c != null && id != -1) {
c.getOut().putOpCode(74);
c.getOut().writeWordBigEndian(id);
}
}
public void sendQuickSong(int id, int songDelay) {
if (c.getOut() != null && c != null) {
c.getOut().putOpCode(121);
c.getOut().writeWordBigEndian(id);
c.getOut().writeWordBigEndian(songDelay);
c.flushOutStream();
}
}
Anyone know if this would work for a winterLove <3 source and SrcAllDummysRemoved client?
yes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Excavation [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
If you're going to go through THIS MUCH WORK, could you atleast document it a little such as including or mentioning which/what Java version and/or JDK version you used and/or what version and/or versions it should work for?Quote:
Originally Posted by Galkon [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
It's very frustrating dealing with a huge complex single block of code that doesn't work, only to find that it actually does, after sitting there for hours trying to think of every possible syntax error in the book, feeling like a complete fucking idiot, only to find out the reason why it doesn't work, is because of the version of Java you're using.
why don't you work backwards from figuring out what Java version was current when this was written over 8 years agoQuote:
Originally Posted by Excavation [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
why wouldn't you google the error or something that would immediately tell you what the problem wasQuote:
It's very frustrating dealing with a huge complex single block of code that doesn't work, only to find that it actually does, after sitting there for hours trying to think of every possible syntax error in the book, feeling like a complete fucking idiot,
That doesn't sound like a very viable response.Quote:
Originally Posted by Scu11 [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
It was the type of syntax error. I don't know every error out there, and what it means by that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Scu11 [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
why???Quote:
Originally Posted by Excavation [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
paste the error into google and you'll find outQuote:
Originally Posted by Excavation [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
Because it would have been a good idea to have it documented to begin with?Quote:
Originally Posted by Scu11 [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
Get a proper IDE like IntelliJ. It suggests to change your language level automatically if you encounter such problem.
+ you truly like to excavate this old stuff :D
Quote:
Originally Posted by Excavation [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]