Thread: RSPSi map editor?

Originally Posted by ColdBlooded

Did I say they can't get paid? it's a map editor, not photoshop CS2042GT limited edition. $40 dollars is reasonable for the amount of code. For $150, I'd expect a rsps client written in pure lwjgl. Talkin bout the concept of $40 vs $150. Sadly, not a lot of forum users on here understand the price difference when their parents pay for their wants.

The reason people will (happily) pay $150 for this product is because it prevents them from:
1). Having to acquire the relevant skills and knowledge to develop the tool themself; and
2). Having to actually spend their time developing the tool.
The fallacy in your logic is that although anyone, given enough experience / time / resources, *could* do this, not everyone *wants* to spend their time / resources doing this - it's the same reason people pay for delivery instead of cooking for themselves: convenience.

Originally Posted by Shivazgod

Alright man calm down I'm just gonna pay the $150 and start messing with it lmao cause I like it either way.

Even if it aint worth $150 it's whatever cause man programming can be such a pain in the ass and it's one of a kind it cost that much cause ovb it can be done just not by everyone..

If you're talking so much smack about it why don't you go ahead and like make your own map editor and release it to the public to learn....

lol this is a cake walk to actual programming, and no opengl support

Originally Posted by lUnknown

The amount of work he's put into this is a great amount, stop bashing because you can't afford to buy it.

i've seen the code its not worth the $150 dollars, you're paying for a buttfuckload of opensource libraries and a few lines of code. and I think about where money goes first before I go on and by the product. and no, totally can't afford it, i spend all my income on crack and hookers (which would actually be a better way to spend the cash)

Originally Posted by hc747

The reason people will (happily) pay $150 for this product is because it prevents them from:
1). Having to acquire the relevant skills and knowledge to develop the tool themself; and
2). Having to actually spend their time developing the tool.
The fallacy in your logic is that although anyone, given enough experience / time / resources, *could* do this, not everyone *wants* to spend their time / resources doing this - it's the same reason people pay for delivery instead of cooking for themselves: convenience.

Not bad argument, though there's no fallacy in my logic as I'm aware not everyone knows how to program or wants to. All I'm saying is that the price is ridiculous (though even if it was cheap I'd just use peter's)