Thread: CorruptionX Client to Work with EmberScape Source?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1 CorruptionX Client to Work with EmberScape Source? 
    Extreme Donator

    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    336
    Thanks given
    4
    Thanks received
    5
    Rep Power
    20
    Just wondering if anyone knows if it's possible to get a CorruptionX client to work with an EmberScape source.
    I think I gave it a shot using Winrar, and FrontEndPlus for decompiling the class files, but I got stuck quite a few times. I'm not interested in trying something like that again if it's only going to fail for sure.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Registered Member
    bracket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    5,278
    Thanks given
    1,059
    Thanks received
    1,465
    Rep Power
    5000
    There is no point in doing this if you have to decompile everything.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    WhiteDownMb | HYBRID JEFE
    Brett the Don's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    2,117
    Thanks given
    349
    Thanks received
    556
    Rep Power
    2540
    Quote Originally Posted by bracket View Post
    There is no point in doing this if you have to decompile everything.
    this right here my guy

    All of humanity's problems stem from man's
    inability to sit quietly in a room by himself




    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Extreme Donator

    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    336
    Thanks given
    4
    Thanks received
    5
    Rep Power
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by Brett the Don View Post
    this right here my guy
    Quote Originally Posted by bracket View Post
    There is no point in doing this if you have to decompile everything.
    What do you mean? I tried decompiling all of the class files from the jar file to get the Java files, thus from there, to recompile with my own code in order to get the client to connect to the server with the new IP.

    Do you mean it's just too much work or something?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Registered Member
    bracket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    5,278
    Thanks given
    1,059
    Thanks received
    1,465
    Rep Power
    5000
    Quote Originally Posted by Excavation View Post
    What do you mean? I tried decompiling all of the class files from the jar file to get the Java files, thus from there, to recompile with my own code in order to get the client to connect to the server with the new IP.

    Do you mean it's just too much work or something?
    You're not going to get the code back in a usable state if you decompile everything.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Discord Johnyblob22#7757


    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    1,384
    Thanks given
    365
    Thanks received
    575
    Rep Power
    5000
    Edit nvm
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Extreme Donator

    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    336
    Thanks given
    4
    Thanks received
    5
    Rep Power
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by bracket View Post
    You're not going to get the code back in a usable state if you decompile everything.
    What do you mean by that? All of the files that I have decompiled seem to be acceptable, but upon compiling they give syntax errors.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Registered Member
    Brainpower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    130
    Thanks given
    13
    Thanks received
    13
    Rep Power
    101
    Deobfuscating and decompiling it to get the client to a runnable state is definitely possible (if you have the cache too).
    Question is why go through all that effort when you can just take a 562 that's partly refactored and skip all of this?
    It's a pain in the ass getting this done and it's most likely not your worth effort.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Extreme Donator

    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    336
    Thanks given
    4
    Thanks received
    5
    Rep Power
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by Brainpower View Post
    Deobfuscating and decompiling it to get the client to a runnable state is definitely possible (if you have the cache too).
    Question is why go through all that effort when you can just take a 562 that's partly refactored and skip all of this?
    It's a pain in the ass getting this done and it's most likely not your worth effort.
    I wanted to see how well structured the CorruptionX client was. As in comparison to the EmberScape, CorruptionX seemed to have a considerable amount of things better.

    I don't know what deobfuscating is/means.
    The cache is needed too?... Oh... well... I think the client loads it by default, though I'm not sure if I have it or not.

    Is it possible to get the client to work with the source though? I gave it a shot, and it seems to have failed miserably.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Registered Member
    Brainpower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    130
    Thanks given
    13
    Thanks received
    13
    Rep Power
    101
    Quote Originally Posted by Excavation View Post
    I wanted to see how well structured the CorruptionX client was. As in comparison to the EmberScape, CorruptionX seemed to have a considerable amount of things better.

    I don't know what deobfuscating is/means.
    The cache is needed too?... Oh... well... I think the client loads it by default, though I'm not sure if I have it or not.

    Is it possible to get the client to work with the source though? I gave it a shot, and it seems to have failed miserably.
    People obfuscate their code, part of this means all variables / class names / method names are renamed to names such as a, A, b, B,
    which causes compilation errors when you decompile the bytecode to .java files.
    If you use a tool to 'unscramble' the 'scrambled' code to and then decompile it it's possible to get it to a runnable state.
    Then when you want to use the client you'd also need their cache as it's customized for that specific client most likely.
    I do however not suggest doing this for obvious reasons.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. Thankful user:


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)


User Tag List

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-21-2013, 04:16 AM
  2. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-02-2012, 11:55 AM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-04-2011, 08:37 AM
  4. Replies: 97
    Last Post: 10-23-2009, 02:57 AM
  5. 525 Client to work with "Pur3zscape"
    By January 1st in forum Requests
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-30-2009, 09:24 AM
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •