There is no point in doing this if you have to decompile everything.
|
Just wondering if anyone knows if it's possible to get a CorruptionX client to work with an EmberScape source.
I think I gave it a shot using Winrar, and FrontEndPlus for decompiling the class files, but I got stuck quite a few times. I'm not interested in trying something like that again if it's only going to fail for sure.
What do you mean? I tried decompiling all of the class files from the jar file to get the Java files, thus from there, to recompile with my own code in order to get the client to connect to the server with the new IP.
Do you mean it's just too much work or something?
Edit nvm
Deobfuscating and decompiling it to get the client to a runnable state is definitely possible (if you have the cache too).
Question is why go through all that effort when you can just take a 562 that's partly refactored and skip all of this?
It's a pain in the ass getting this done and it's most likely not your worth effort.
I wanted to see how well structured the CorruptionX client was. As in comparison to the EmberScape, CorruptionX seemed to have a considerable amount of things better.
I don't know what deobfuscating is/means.
The cache is needed too?... Oh... well... I think the client loads it by default, though I'm not sure if I have it or not.
Is it possible to get the client to work with the source though? I gave it a shot, and it seems to have failed miserably.
People obfuscate their code, part of this means all variables / class names / method names are renamed to names such as a, A, b, B,
which causes compilation errors when you decompile the bytecode to .java files.
If you use a tool to 'unscramble' the 'scrambled' code to and then decompile it it's possible to get it to a runnable state.
Then when you want to use the client you'd also need their cache as it's customized for that specific client most likely.
I do however not suggest doing this for obvious reasons.
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
Thread Information |
Users Browsing this ThreadThere are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests) |