|
|
07-15-2010, 03:08 PM
Does anyone know if a ReplayingDecoder would find any trouble by the networking speed? A ReplayingDecoder is easier to multiplex the protocol, but I've been told that if the networking speed is slow it can be slower than using a FrameDecoder.
Design wise I'd certainly prefer using a ReplayingDecoder but I don't really have the oppertunity to host my framework and compare the performance of FrameDecoder and a ReplayingDecoder in a hosted environment where I connect to a remote peer.
Thanks in advance.
From what I read, FrameDecoder would be faster then a ReplayingDecoder, if I were you I'd go with what you feel comfortable with, but if you prefer something with speed then it would be FrameDecoder
EDIT:
Didn't notice this was old, was just lurking through help section.
| « Variable p2 in player | [help] Client dropping for basically no reason. » |
| Thread Information |
Users Browsing this ThreadThere are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests) |
Maxi
