|
|
04-15-2011, 10:34 PM
I do websites. I don't ask for much in return, besides to be credited for my work. You have to pay for the webhost though. I would recommend using hosting24 as your webhost/domain. They come with a free domain at as low as 5$ a month for webhosting. Some of my works can be found below.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] - (Being worked on)
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] - (Soon to be set up)
Hey, I am just trying to be nice, if you don't want to do it, or you don't like my work, then don't ask.
NOTE: I am not a pro!
Thanks, R3acti0n.
Sure thing, added.
The RuneScape oldskool was released, no experience needed to upload it to your host and install it. Anyway good luck with your services.
Im judging about Fury - PK cus the other one is pretty bad...
Fury PK:
Pros:
Nice layout, you put the things in the right places so everything is pretty noticable.
I like the nav buttons
Cons:
The images just dont do it (Layout Images)
The HTML gave me epilepsy.... Especially the <br /> tag... Its used to much.. I suggest you get into some basic CSS..
Overall i would give this a 4/10 but still good job on the effort
Mate, I Don't think you should be working on sites for other people until your coding gets a bit tighter, In your fates redemption site the HTML is far from Valid, Heres the results from the Official HTML Validator,
Now, I'm not saying I'm an Einstein with web development, but I know that 1 HTML Document shouldn't have 7 errors & 2 warnings,
Heres the results of my personal website,
The 1 warning isn't even a serious warning, just a warning for a tag i use in my unicode that's not compatible with older browsers
Here's the error information from the Validator check-
Considering I Hardly code html & I only got 1 warning for a minor issue I think someone who's making templates for other people should NOT have 7 errors, 6 of which are reasonably serious.The Unicode Byte-Order Mark (BOM) in UTF-8 encoded files is known to cause problems for some text editors and older browsers. You may want to consider avoiding its use until it is better supported.
Not sure many people care???Originally Posted by Innovationindesign
Mate, I Don't think you should be working on sites for other people until your coding gets a bit tighter, In your fates redemption site the HTML is far from Valid, Heres the results from the Official HTML Validator,
Now, I'm not saying I'm an Einstein with web development, but I know that 1 HTML Document shouldn't have 7 errors & 2 warnings,
Heres the results of my personal website,
The 1 warning isn't even a serious warning, just a warning for a tag i use in my unicode that's not compatible with older browsers
Here's the error information from the Validator check-
Considering I Hardly code html & I only got 1 warning for a minor issue I think someone who's making templates for other people should NOT have 7 errors, 6 of which are reasonably serious.
Who's talking about [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] cus u took a screen of it..Mate, I Don't think you should be working on sites for other people until your coding gets a bit tighter, In your fates redemption site the HTML is far from Valid, Heres the results from the Official HTML Validator,
Now, I'm not saying I'm an Einstein with web development, but I know that 1 HTML Document shouldn't have 7 errors & 2 warnings,
Heres the results of my personal website,
The 1 warning isn't even a serious warning, just a warning for a tag i use in my unicode that's not compatible with older browsers
Here's the error information from the Validator check-
Considering I Hardly code html & I only got 1 warning for a minor issue I think someone who's making templates for other people should NOT have 7 errors, 6 of which are reasonably serious.
innovationindesign looks good, and the source isnt that bad iether, therefor i dont believe that you made the layout, but if im wrong i apologize.
Mate, I Don't think you should be working on sites for other people until your coding gets a bit tighter, In your fates redemption site the HTML is far from Valid, Heres the results from the Official HTML Validator,
Now, I'm not saying I'm an Einstein with web development, but I know that 1 HTML Document shouldn't have 7 errors & 2 warnings,
Heres the results of my personal website,
The 1 warning isn't even a serious warning, just a warning for a tag i use in my unicode that's not compatible with older browsers
Here's the error information from the Validator check-
Considering I Hardly code html & I only got 1 warning for a minor issue I think someone who's making templates for other people should NOT have 7 errors, 6 of which are reasonably serious.
Sorry for my non-proness. Maybe you should read my thread more to understand I am not the best.
| « After a web-designer | Looking for a website developer - PHP, SQL. » |
| Thread Information |
Users Browsing this ThreadThere are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests) |
