Conversation Between funkE and Major

42 Visitor Messages

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
  1. Someone (cjay?) converted the original apollo to 474 before, but apollo was intentionally designed for pre-400 clients (hence why e.g. the fs stuff is not abstracted away) - Graham mentions this on the scape-emu release thread. If you're interested in a server that would support any revision I'm working on a non-Java proof of concept.
  2. Hmm, I was under the impression it would work on higher revisions because of the protocol support. I've seen an Apollo 508 before, which I think gave me the impression it was designed for it. Why only support that revision range?
  3. Apollo is only designed for 317-377. The definition decoders have no backwards-incompatible changes, so the 377 one should work.
  4. if Apollo supports different revisions of the protocol it should support different versions of cache file parsers since those change too.
  5. Not entirely sure what you mean by this, can you explain further?
  6. Working on adding path validation to Apollo (to Apollo standards, fully commented and tested). Apollo supports different protocol revisions, but not cache. For example, item definitions will change from revision to revision. Possibly look into that in the future?
  7. Your multivote post should no longer require approval whenever edited.
  8. Yeah!
  9. permanently?
  10. Infraction build up (including the final one being given by me - that was a happy day).
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 42
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast