#4,
I really like the blending and contrast of the colors.
|
Maybe we can make NR better, I barely go there due to the arrogance and biased levels there, phew shits crazy.
Here.
#1
#2
#3
#4
I see where -2006- is, is he, SAT on NR?
These guys are supposedly the best of the best, and they just flat out deny criticism and ego boost eachother, I left for this reason, but I thought maybe this thread might be different.
3....
The depth is good in #4 but the lighting kills it for me, 3 is out of the picture. I'm going to have to vote for #1 due to some empty space on the left of tag #2.
I hate to say this but Evil Kidd thinks his work is professional when really it's not. I've been to a lot of gfx forums and I can see better work at just a first glance, it's just too bad most of near-reality don't get to see these tags or their opinions would completely change.
I'd say number four. The lighting is really well done, and there's a good flow to it. Only nitpick about it that I have is that the render is placed in the very centre of the tag, but it works for this sig.
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
Thread Information |
Users Browsing this ThreadThere are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests) |