Thread: [Challenge #1] Rune-Server Math Challenge

Time for a Math Challenge Everyone at R-S!

I've made my version of the R-S Math Challenges, and I wish you good luck!

The first person to correctly solve the math challenge is the winner of #1!

The rules are: you must explain your answer in depth, must prove your answer as well.

Post your answers on this thread!

The first challenge is attached [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] ! Good luck!

Hint:

Spoiler for [QUOTE=Jack Daniels;2799674:

So basicly, S = T + (3,3)

Therefor T is a subset of S , so |S| >= |T| lul

also

|N| + m = |N| which proves |S| = |T|

and

"an infinite set can always be
added an element without changing its
cardinalityy, but a finite set never has this
property" from

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]


None of the above actually proves it , its just sort of using the definition[/QUOTE]

Its one of these questions that is so simplistic, it just stumps me on what kind of answer / proof people look for. Each point can clearly only map to another point on the other set, so even if one element is removed they must still match, idk how you would mathematically prove that though.

Originally Posted by Martin

Its one of these questions that is so simplistic, it just stumps me on what kind of answer / proof people look for. Each point can clearly only map to another point on the other set, so even if one element is removed they must still match, idk how you would mathematically prove that though.

That's a good start, keep working on it!

So basicly, S = T + (3,3)

Therefor T is a subset of S , so |S| >= |T| lul

also

|N| + m = |N| which proves |S| = |T|

and

"an infinite set can always be
added an element without changing its
cardinalityy, but a finite set never has this
property" from

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]


None of the above actually proves it , its just sort of using the definition

Originally Posted by Jack Daniels

So basicly, S = T + (3,3)

Therefor T is a subset of S , so |S| >= |T| lul

also

|N| + m = |N| which proves |S| = |T|

and

"an infinite set can always be
added an element without changing its
cardinalityy, but a finite set never has this
property" from

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]


None of the above actually proves it , its just sort of using the definition

This is the right idea, keep working at it and you'll have the answer. I'm going to post this as a hint on the thread.

Originally Posted by pistolpete332

This is the right idea, keep working at it and you'll have the answer. I'm going to post this as a hint on the thread.

what idea? I didnt have any ideas


This is basicly " prove that infinite = infinite -1 " rediculous


The set of points is basicly the area of the circle, since both have an area of 4 pi they are equal since points dont have a dimension


its funny that you put university or college math on a forum filled with 12-14 year old idiots who dont know how to solve an equation like 2x + 1 = 5 and only know how to add new shops in shops.cfg and how to code using tutorials , ohyea and how to add c00l commands like "::infspec"

Originally Posted by Jack Daniels

what idea? I didnt have any ideas


This is basicly " prove that infinite = infinite -1 " rediculous


The set of points is basicly the area of the circle, since both have an area of 4 pi they are equal since points dont have a dimension


its funny that you put university or college math on a forum filled with 12-14 year old idiots who dont know how to solve an equation like 2x + 1 = 5 and only know how to add new shops in shops.cfg and how to code using tutorials , ohyea and how to add c00l commands like "::infspec"

I fit under the 12-14 y/o category plus the answer is
X = 2

Originally Posted by Jack Daniels

what idea? I didnt have any ideas


This is basicly " prove that infinite = infinite -1 " rediculous


The set of points is basicly the area of the circle, since both have an area of 4 pi they are equal since points dont have a dimension


its funny that you put university or college math on a forum filled with 12-14 year old idiots who dont know how to solve an equation like 2x + 1 = 5 and only know how to add new shops in shops.cfg and how to code using tutorials , ohyea and how to add c00l commands like "::infspec"

Yes, but that doesn't prove cardinality.

Originally Posted by pistolpete332

Yes, but that doesn't prove cardinality.

So you have an actual answer to this problem?

Originally Posted by Russian

So you have an actual answer to this problem?

Yes I do