Hello, Rune-Server.
The point of this thread is to create debatable topics for the intelligent people of this community. Before we get started, I want to cover a few things pertaining to Langans artificial intelligence theory that broke through what the world knows of neural networking.
Artificial intelligence to sum it up, is basically intelligence of machines. Your visual representation of this post falls into artificial intelligence. As Langan said, is this post even here? Are you seeing this post pixelated and printed out onto your monitor? Is it possible for this to even not be real? If you can't choose then you can't perceptually experience life.
In psychology, logic is one of the only things keeping us sane. Keeping us knowledgeable. Keeping us aware of what is real or not. Without it, you would not even have a single perception in your lifetime. By this standard, who's the say life would be real? Who's to say any of us are real? We depend on Psychological concepts to keep us in-tact with what is false and what is not.
Some of you may argue with me, saying this doesn't fall under the artificial intelligence category. Others may agree. Some may even coincide with me and understand every single thing I'm typing to you. Yet, think outside the box. Think of if your situation was not dependent on Psychology. How would you feel then? What would this be? You could not create the image in your brain, thus a perception of what you are seeing would not be here. Does that mean it is not real? It isn't to the person without the perception, yet you see it clearly. Logically from your point of view, it's real. Logic from the others, it isn't. Do you see where I'm going with this?
This next paragraph is important.
Some of his mosts famous words tied around to insight. If we can base insight to god using nothing but binary logic, we have it made. But what does this mean? You must look at it like this. The insight is our perception. The binary logic setting it to a point where religion has no value true or false. The worlds most dominant armed forces, leaders, ranks, all base what they do on religion. It is our downfall. It makes us machines to its terrorizing of the world. It makes us exactly what we disbelieve; artificial intelligence.
Religion is extraneous to our society today. We don't need it, nor should we count or depend on it. We should base society and civilization off of our own selves. Only intelligence levels. I have an I.Q. of 138. That score is a certifiable genius by the State of Texas, and 2 points below certifiable genius by the United States; and I am only 16 years old. The average person has an intelligence quotient is 90-109. My IQ is seemingly very high. Which is a keyword. Seemingly. Yes, it may seem high to you. But is it high to me? I can't answer that, because you can not look into my mental perception.
So my first question to all of you today:
Is artificial intelligence corrupting our society? Or do you believe it is good on the basis I have described? Why?
- I personally believe as of this point, artificial intelligence is corrupting our society. At this point in time, we do not base our civilization as man off of our own intelligence. We base it off religion. Religion should be used with binary logic. Without binary logic in the religion field, we will get nowhere. With it, our entire global community may actually get along for once. If we were to instate binary logic and understand perceptions better as one, we could be a great thing. As of now, man doesn't understand what we are doing. We are destroying this world and it will be gone very soon if something isn't done.



Missed r-s mayn

saifix