[ANY] Queued Switching System [Server Sided]

**Da Real Underoath** · 01-04-2013, 01:08 AM

Originally Posted by Ey Cuzzo

Or...

in resetItems(int)

Code:

		if(c.getAwaitingUpdate())
			c.setAwaitingUpdate(false);

In wearItem(int, int) under if(slot >= 0 && ...)

Code:

c.setAwaitingUpdate(true);

In client.java, in process:

Code:

		if(getAwaitingUpdate())
			getItems().resetItems(3214);

In Player.java declare:

Code:

	public void setAwaitingUpdate(boolean update) {
		awaitingUpdate = update;
	}
	
	public boolean getAwaitingUpdate() {
		return awaitingUpdate;
	}
	
	private boolean awaitingUpdate = false;

Edit: got derepped for posting "shit code making the thread look bad." If you think the above code is shit, you're a moron. It really can't get ANY simpler.

Can't believe people are trying to sell this.

**Spar** · 01-04-2013, 01:33 AM

Originally Posted by Da Real Underoath

Can't believe people are trying to sell this.

But that's not what hes selling now is it..?

Refer to:

Originally Posted by L__A

So far from true it's funny

Let me point out the flaws in your code;

1. toWear[invslot] = true is wrong since you declared "toWear" as an int array, not a boolean array.
2. You're never storing the item id that needs to be equipped
3. You're enhanced iterating though an integer array and using "toWear[i]" which will give you an index out of bounds error if the item id (that you never stored) is greater than 27.
4. You're checking if "toWear[i]" is true when it's an integer array.
5. equipItem(i) would not work since you also need to specify the item slot in a PI
6.

**Ey Cuzzo** · 01-04-2013, 02:20 AM

Originally Posted by bwump

But that's not what hes selling now is it..?

Refer to:

It's actually exactly what he's selling though...?

**L__A** · 01-04-2013, 03:57 AM

Originally Posted by Ey Cuzzo

It's actually exactly what he's selling though...?

Ask anyone who I've sold this to - it's not it ~.~

**Ey Cuzzo** · 01-04-2013, 05:03 AM

Originally Posted by L__A

Ask anyone who I've sold this to - it's not it ~.~

If you would like, send me the usual code in PM. If its anything more complicated than what I had posted, it's really unnecessary.

**Thock321** · 01-04-2013, 07:44 AM

Originally Posted by SGPK

its probably something like this

declare ->

Code:

public int[] toWear = new int[28];
public boolean needsToDo = false;

itemwear ->

Code:

toWear[invslot] = true;
needsToDo = true;

process ->

Code:

if (needsToDo) {
 for (int i : toWear) {
  if (toWear[i]) equipItem(i);
  toWear[i] = false;
 }
 needsToDo = false;
}

Your code is totally wrong, and you could make a real queue.

**L__A** · 01-04-2013, 09:12 AM

Originally Posted by Ey Cuzzo

If you would like, send me the usual code in PM. If its anything more complicated than what I had posted, it's really unnecessary.

The code itself is rather simplistic, so I'll just tell you what Jagex does. Jagex queues all switches (a maximum of 8 per tick) and performs them all at once at the end of a tick cycle (and in turn, updates the inventory). That is exactly what I do, nothing more, nothing less.

If you truly coded your extremely complicated if statement (internet needs a sarcasm font) then you should be able to code what I just said, as well.

**Ey Cuzzo** · 01-04-2013, 09:39 AM

Originally Posted by L__A

The code itself is rather simplistic, so I'll just tell you what Jagex does. Jagex queues all switches (a maximum of 8 per tick) and performs them all at once at the end of a tick cycle (and in turn, updates the inventory). That is exactly what I do, nothing more, nothing less.

If you truly coded your extremely complicated if statement (internet needs a sarcasm font) then you should be able to code what I just said, as well.

Putting it in a "queue" is rather extraneous, when you can easily update the inventory/equipment tab at the end of the cycle as I displayed earlier. However, due to popular belief; if it works, it works.

Saying that, I still don't believe this should be sold as it is quite simple and not at all difficult to implement. Almost like selling the DDS spec function.

**Karma_K** · 01-04-2013, 06:42 PM

how muuch would this cost exactly

**Velocity** · 01-04-2013, 07:10 PM

I hope for the love of god you're not actually making a queue...

Thread: [ANY] Queued Switching System [Server Sided]

Thread Tools

Users Browsing this Thread

User Tag List

Similar Threads

Server Sided and Client Sided Donator Crowns!

[$40] Server sided end of voting system

client sided or server sided?

help on client sided and server sided